您的位置: 标准下载 » 国际标准 » ISO 国际标准 »

ISO 10552-2012 计时仪器柄头和密封管设计和尺寸

时间:2024-05-05 18:29:18 来源: 标准资料网 作者:标准资料网 阅读:9288
下载地址: 点击此处下载
【英文标准名称】:Timekeepinginstruments-Crownsandsealedtubes-Designsanddimensions
【原文标准名称】:计时仪器柄头和密封管设计和尺寸
【标准号】:ISO10552-2012
【标准状态】:现行
【国别】:国际
【发布日期】:2012-02-01
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:国际标准化组织(IX-ISO)
【起草单位】:ISO/TC114
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:
【英文主题词】:Design;Designations;Dimensionaltolerances;Dimensions;Sleevesforwindingbuttons;Timemeasurement;Timemeasuringdevice;Time-measuringinstruments;Watches;Wrist-watches
【摘要】:
【中国标准分类号】:Y11
【国际标准分类号】:39_040_01
【页数】:10P;A4
【正文语种】:英语


【英文标准名称】:Assessmentofwater,soilandgasesfortheiraggressivenesstoconcrete;principlesandlimitingvalues
【原文标准名称】:对混凝土有侵蚀性的水、土壤和气体的评估.第1部分:原则和极限值
【标准号】:DIN4030-1-1991
【标准状态】:作废
【国别】:德国
【发布日期】:1991-06
【实施或试行日期】:
【发布单位】:德国标准化学会(DIN)
【起草单位】:
【标准类型】:()
【标准水平】:()
【中文主题词】:土壤;耐气试验;耐化学性试验;评定;耐力;建筑;钢筋混凝土结构;混凝土结构;底部;施工材料;气体;极限(数学);加筋混凝土;耐水解;水;混凝土
【英文主题词】:Bottom;Chemical-resistancetests;Concretestructures;Concretes;Construction;Constructionmaterials;Evaluations;Gases;Gas-resistancetests;Hydrolyticresistance;Limits(mathematics);Reinforcedconcrete;Reinforcedconcretestructures;Resistance;Soils;Water
【摘要】:ThestandardlaysdowncriteriafortheopinionoftheaggressivenessofliquidsofapredominantlynaturalcompositionandofsoilsandgasescontainingsubstanceswhichattackhardenedconcreteproducedinaccordancewithDIN1045.Thestandarddoesnotapplytoconcentratedsolutionssuchascertaintypesofindustrialwastewater.
【中国标准分类号】:Q10
【国际标准分类号】:91_100_30
【页数】:8P.;A4
【正文语种】:德语


Product Code:SAE ARD50010
Title:Recommended Rms Terms and Parameters
Issuing Committee:
Scope: The terms used in most engineering technologies tend to be physical characteristics such as speed-rate of turn and fuel consumption. while they may require very careful definition and control of the way in which they are measured, the terms themselves are not subject to different interpretations. Reliability, Maintainability and Supportability (RMS) however, use terms that are mathematically defined. As a result, there are more than 200 terms defined in just the documents reviewed so far, many of which have multiple interpretations. This proliferation of definitions of the terms leads to problems when one attempts to compare the performance of one system to another. For example, the RMS performance of a transport aircraft from the commercial arena is measured using metrics that are not the same as those for a fighter or attack aircraft from a military service. It is accepted that some of the metrics may be unique because of the nature of the missions, but is the strong conviction of the Government and Industry practitioners who make the SAE G11 committee that there should be some fundamental definitions used for all systems.